Why companies that wait on quantum will have to patch their security twice

发布时间    来源
Episode 设置


登录已过期或未登录,无法修改。请先登录后再试。

摘要

Security teams are being asked to pay for two upgrades at once, and Algorand CEO William Herkelrath argues they should be treated as one job. His case is that firms patching for AI threats now will have to redo the same work for quantum resistance a year later, and that CISO budgets for 2027 already carry the line item. He speaks to Yahoo Finance's Brooke DiPalma about what the upgrade touches, who pays for it, and how fast demand has moved. Note that Algorand sells quantum-resistant infrastructure, so he has a commercial interest in the timeline he describes. Featuring William Herkelrath, CEO, Algorand Brooke DiPalma, Senior Reporter, Yahoo Finance Timestamps 0:00 What the quantum threat to encryption actually is 1:13 What it costs to be late 2:25 Quantum is already a line item in 2027 security budgets 4:11 Why do it twice, and the case for one upgrade 5:22 What is already protected, and what is not Context not stated in the interview: the US standards body NIST has proposed deprecating quantum-vulnerable algorithms after 2030 and disallowing them after 2035, which is the planning baseline most migration timelines work back from. #Quantum #Cybersecurity #Encryption #Algorand #YahooFinance == AlphaSpace by Yahoo Finance: A Professional-Grade Investment Platform Built for Everyday Investors. 👉 https://finance.yahoo.com/about/promos/gold/alphaspace?ncid=100003571

GPT-4正在为你翻译摘要中......

中英文字稿